Bush in Constant State of Denial Regarding al-Qaeda and Iraq
Commentary ~ June 18, 2004: Even after the
commission investigating 9/11 reported that it had found no evidence
of any relationship between al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, George
Bush stands obstinately behind his justification for launching an
invasion of Iraq.
Critics of his administration, from both sides of
the aisles, are starting to wonder whether or not Bush is in a constant
state of denial, or just caught up in a web of lies.
The New York Times has even gone so far
as to ask the president to apologize to the American people for
misleading them.
The 9/11 commission’s lengthy chronology of
the events of Sept. 11, 2001, said that although there was evidence
of contacts between Iraq and al-Qaeda in the 1990's, "they
do not appear to have resulted in a collaborative relationship."
The commission pointed out, however, that al-Qaeda
leaders, including Osama bin Laden, would have nothing to do with
Hussein because of his staunch belief in a separation of church
and state. While Iraq was fiercely secular and had Christians and
women in the upper echelons of its government, al-Qaeda is fiercely
religious and insists on a marriage of church and state –
and no women in power. Unlike Saddam Hussein, bin Laden would never
allow Christians to run important ministries.
Bush knows that the intelligent among the American
population will probably see through his lies. A large percentage
of the public, however, continues to blindly follow Bush and believes
whatever he says without question. Opinion polls show that large
numbers of Americans still believe Iraq and Hussein had a hand in
planning and executing the 9/11 attacks. Critics of the administration
say that Bush and his aides have fueled that public misperception
by remarks such as those the president made today.
In an article on Thursday, Newsday remarked
that with no weapons of mass destruction found, Iraqi resentment
of the U.S. occupation increasing and violence unabated, the commission
statement that Hussein and al-Qaida never developed a "collaborative
relationship" represents a new blow to the administration's
already strained credibility.
The Guardian newspaper said the administration's obstructive
attitude to the fact-finding efforts of the commission, which it
only set up reluctantly, under pressure from the families of September
11 victims, is hardly surprising. "Mr Bush has a vested interest
in keeping the American public confused," proclaimed the editorial
People who blindly support this president without
questioning his motives and the powers who are pulling his strings
are as guilty as he is. As the blood in Iraq runs deeper than the
oil it was meant to protect, those Americans who blindly stand behind
Bush simply because he happens to wear the jersey of their team
should stop and ask themselves how complacent they are in his crimes
against humanity.
Links / References from this story:
The
Plain Truth
The New York Times editorial asking for Bush's apology